An invoice may be correct in the sales software but contain an error in the accounting system after it's transferred. Amounts, references, or dates aren't always copied in the same way from one system to another. To avoid these discrepancies, the company must consider data flow before implementing electronic invoicing on a large scale.
Map the tools before connecting them
Start by listing the software used for sales, purchasing, invoicing, and accounting. Then identify the information that each tool creates, receives, or modifies.
For example, the sales department might record a customer's contact information and then send the data to billing. Accounting would then retrieve the information needed to record the transaction. If each department enters the same data separately, discrepancies become more likely.
The digitization of invoices yields better results when teams know where the information is created and which system is authoritative.
Avoid double entries
A data export may suffice for a small organization, provided the volume remains limited and the controls are clear. A company that processes a large number of invoices may benefit from exploring an automated connection between its systems.
The choice depends on cost, volume, and the risk of error. More advanced integration requires time and sometimes technical assistance. A manual transfer remains simpler to implement, but it depends more on the people performing it.
Compare the two methods based on your actual operations, not just the list of features advertised by a vendor.
Define the control rules
Before transferring the data to accounting, the company must specify which data will be verified and by whom. Checks may include invoice numbers, amounts, dates, customer references, and necessary tax information.
The handling of corrections must also be planned. If an invoice is modified, the systems must reflect the appropriate situation without creating duplicates or retaining contradictory amounts.
The procedures must explain how to detect an anomaly and how to correct it. Without this rule, teams risk addressing problems on a case-by-case basis.
Check the reform requirements
Regulatory electronic invoicing is not limited to transferring data to accounting software. The companies concerned must also comply with the format and transmission requirements stipulated by French law.
Formats like Factur-X, UBL, and CII allow you to structure invoice data. How your software generates or receives them depends on its configuration and available connections.
Before investing in a new integration, ask the vendor what already works and what will require development or adaptation.
Test the problematic cases
A limited trial should cover routine invoices, but also less frequent situations: missing data, invoice corrections, or failed transfers. These cases demonstrate whether the teams can detect and resolve anomalies.
Electronic invoicing should make transactions easier to track. It should not create an opaque system that only a few specialists can understand.
To prepare your digital exchanges, consult Klekoon's page dedicated to electronic invoicing .
Comments